Named review intake — v0.1.0 draft candidate
Status: unassigned template; no reviewer appointed and no review claim permitted
Create one record per reviewer and scope. Follow ../../docs/research/REVIEWER_APPOINTMENT_AND_REVIEW_PROTOCOL.md and validate the machine record against SCHEMAS/research-ops/0.1.0/review-record.schema.json.
| Field | Candidate value |
|---|---|
| Review ID | Pending |
| Publication/release ID and exact manifest | fde-benchmark-0.1.0-draft-candidate; regenerate manifest after final bytes |
| Review type | Pending |
| Reviewer name, affiliation, ORCID | Unassigned |
| Qualification evidence | Pending |
| Relationship/conflict disclosure | Pending |
| Independent conflict reviewer and conclusion | Unassigned / pending |
| Frozen questions and out-of-scope list | Pending |
| Material paths, versions, and digests | Pending |
| Access/confidentiality/compensation terms | Pending |
| Findings and author response | None; review not started |
| Signed disposition | None |
| Exact public review wording | Prohibited until completion |
Do not prefill a real name, institution, biography, signature, or favorable outcome without the person’s verified acceptance and retained evidence.